English Filipino French German Italian Portuguese Spanish About this Translator
Home / Media & Info / BATS Archives / Reader's Digest Reveals Anti-Bat Bias
BATS Magazine

VOLUME 1, NO. 1 Winter 1984


Reader's Digest Reveals Anti-Bat Bias

In October, 1983 Reader's Digest requested and received extensive material on bats, their value and plight from BCI. A member of the Reader's Digest editorial staff even spent more than an hour personally interviewing Dr. Tuttle. Yet their January, 1984 issue includes a story titled, "Twinkle, Twinkle Little Bat," in which no major myths are dispelled, and readers are left mostly with a negative image.

Vampire damage to cattle is emphasized. No values are admitted, and blood drinking is mentioned at the beginning, in the middle and at the end. Finally, we are informed that "The real hazard these winged mammals pose is from rabies. In the United States, bats transmit more rabies than dogs do."

The truth is, over the past four decades, more than 130 people have died of dog and cat rabies compared with l0 from bats. Recent vaccination programs have greatly reduced the danger of rabies from pets, but dog attacks still kill as many people annually as have died of disease from bats in four decades!

Hopefully, many BCI members will wish to protest this misleading article. Write to: Julia M. Jeffrey, Reader's Digest, Pleasantville, NY 10570.

Top of page View as PDF
 
All articles in this issue:
Bacardi Joins BCI in Saving Bats
Fruit Bat Off the Menu?
Reader's Digest Reveals Anti-Bat Bias
More Damaging Anti-Bat Prejudice
More Ladies Adopt Bats
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Bat Program Completed
Bat Program Available
Bats in the News
Correspondence From Our Members
World Conservation Strategy

Unless otherwise noted, all images are copyright ©Merlin D. Tuttle and/or ©Bat Conservation International